top of page

Examining the Bounds of Progress: Navigating the Fine Line in DEIB Trends

In the dynamic landscape of Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI), I've observed that terminologies and concepts are frequently evolving, sometimes to the extent of prioritizing inclusivity above clarity. This reflects a broader societal trend towards heightened sensitivity, which, while well-intentioned, often feels excessive. Reflecting on this, I've come to believe that our collective pursuit of 'wokeness' might be overshadowing the substance of what DEI endeavors to achieve.

There appears to be an emphasis on adopting ever-new terminologies to account for every conceivable form of identity and experience. This approach, however, seems to dilute the focus from actionable change to a perpetual re-education on language. For instance, the term 'microaggression' is viewed by some as a tool for articulating subtle forms of discrimination, yet others argue it might serve as a crutch rather than addressing underlying issues. Similarly, concepts like 'neurodiversity' are sometimes contested for their implications, even as they seek to foster a more inclusive understanding of cognitive differences.

I've noticed that each week brings with it new terminologies spurred by individual experiences of offense, suggesting a trend towards personalizing DEI to an unsustainable degree. If, hypothetically, a narrative emerged advocating for the discontinuation of terms like 'black' on the grounds of offensiveness, it would represent a singular viewpoint rather than a collective consensus. This highlights the risk of overindividualizing the discourse on diversity to the point where it fragments rather than unifies.

The rapid introduction of new DEI terminologies risks shifting our focus away from the foundational goals of empathy, understanding, and substantive action. While language plays a critical role in shaping our understanding and approach to DEI, it is imperative that it serves as a bridge to deeper engagement rather than becoming an end in itself. Thus, a more measured approach to evolving DEI language might better serve our collective pursuit of a truly inclusive society, one that values both the power of words and the imperative of meaningful action.

In the quest for a more equitable and inclusive society, it becomes crucial to remember that the strength of our diversity lies not just in the words we choose to describe it, but in the actions we take to embrace and celebrate it. As we navigate the complex landscape of DEI, let us strive for a balance that honors both the nuance of language and the imperative of meaningful action. May we forge a path that is as reflective as it is forward-looking, recognizing that true inclusivity transcends terminology and is manifest in our collective commitment to understanding, empathy, and change.

Together, in our pursuit of a more just and inclusive world, let's ensure that our dialogue around DEI remains as dynamic and multifaceted as the human experience it seeks to represent. By doing so, we not only enrich our understanding but also deepen our capacity for compassion and collective action. In the end, it is through our shared efforts to bridge divides and embrace diversity in all its forms that we can truly achieve the ideals at the heart of DEI.

All the best!

Jenora Ledbetter


The Self Care Network LLC 

5 views0 comments

Recent Posts

See All


bottom of page